Saturday, March 6, 2021

Teen son's essay on "circumcision"

 Of course he got a little help from mom and dad, but still very proud:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is circumcision logical? To be able to answer that, first, we have to understand what circumcision is. Circumcision is derived from two latin terms. The first is the latin term “circum,”  means circle. The second latin term “caedere,” means to cut. At some time, the terms were adopted to become what we now know as “circumcision,” the ritual procedure that removes parts of a person’s genitalia. 

The way that circumcision is done today, is illogical. In the present day, circumcision is done to tens of thousands of healthy children daily. Circumcision should only be performed if the person it is being performed on has a medical problem with their genitalia that requires it. This procedure is a problem because it can cause many problems with the person’s genitalia later in life, especially when there was no problem in the first place.

Some people practice the procedure on their children because their religion calls for it. The problem with this is that they are forcing a religion onto their child, that the child may choose to not comply with when they’re older. Doctors usually cut off this body part because it can have medical problems later in life. A counter to this claim though, is so can all body parts, so if we’re removing a child's genitalia, why not remove their toes, fingers, and ear lobes too?

Why has this been going on for millennia? Control, aesthetics, and economics. Control to limit sexual choice. Aesthetics to suit cultural norms. Economics makes people dependant on the procedure for a livelihood. 

In sum, circumcision is illogical to be performed on children because it takes away their individual choice. The only reason for the procedure, should be if there is a specific problem with the person’s genitals. There are many groups addressing the root causes of gentital mutilation. Will you join them?


Monday, February 15, 2021

Lawsuit filed against American Academy of Pediatrics

In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published a new policy on "circumcision."  There are individuals that consider themselves genital autonomy advocates and/or intactivists (activists for an intact body).

The statement that has gotten them upset is "...health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks..."  There is no longer mentions of the physiological structure and functions of the male prepuce (aka "foreskin"), which previous policies acknowledged.  This leaves many to believe that the male prepuce has no value to the individual  The AAP also admitted that the risks are unknown as they are not well tracked.  I believe that if more men had a clue about what was taken away from them as infants, more would recognize the harm done to them and report on it.  Since it is done at such an early age, there is no way for the individuals to know.

Organizations and individuals have been making shots across the AAP's bow to convince them to modify the statement:

This includes protests at annual conferences and protests where individuals from the task force work.

A documentary was created and widely distributed in 2018 and 2019 that included interviews with some involved with the policy.

Yet, the AAP has not made a new policy or any concessions regarding the expired policy.

It is believed that more boys have been harmed by this unnecessary practice due to the trust that medical professionals and parents put in the AAP.

The AAP policy has driven many to spend countless hours attempting to educate individuals on the harms, something that the AAP has a duty to do themselves.

Thus, a paper was written and published in the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy titled "Is Circumcision a Fraud."  The paper can be downloaded at https://www.circumcisionisafraud.com/ where you may also find the legal filing.

Peter Adler can be seen presenting the case of fraud at the 2014 Genital Autonomy Symposium here.

Consider following this on social media and adding your email address to get updates, all of which are identified near the bottom of the website.  Also, if you feel personally affected by "circumcision" and/or the AAP's policy, please be sure to share your story in the "Stories" section of the site.





Wednesday, January 6, 2021

What stage is the genital autonomy movement in?

I have shared this parallel verbally in the past.  Here it is in writing:

A new business isn't just turned on like a light switch.  Any experience entrepreneur knows this.  You have to come up with a vision, put together a business plan, gather funding (if you're not already wealthy), design your product/service, manufacture your product, stock your product, market your product and distribute your product.  In some cases, like mobile phones, society adopts the product as a standard requirement for the masses (ref: "Obamaphone").  Of course there can be some overlap in these stages and some circular aspects as you improve your product/service.

With the genital autonomy movement it would be really nice to jump to the last stage where society adopts the standard and government incorporates the standard into law.  Unfortunately, we don't have the massive acceptance level yet.  I believe we are at the "market your product" stage still.  We have large stockpiles of product.  Our marketing options are limited as many of the marketing avenues are not open to us, so we have to work with what we have.

We have to be careful about the perceptions of our product.  Like the 5G worries with mobile phones, we have to win people's hearts instead of attempting to force the product on them.

For those of us that are victims of genital mutilation, this fact is very disheartening.  We want everyone to see the obvious benefits of genital autonomy and to buy our product right away.  Unfortunately, society has never changed that fast and easily.

I have worked with multiple large (Fortune 500 level) organizations and was frequently involved with major changes due to new technologies.  As obvious as it was to me the benefits of making the change was, I still had to win the hearts of the people to help the organization work through the change.  Sometimes the leadership would say things that helped that process along, but even those leaders recognized that things couldn't be forced.  I would often have to take a step back and analyze the status of the situation.  Once I did so, I would often see a pathway forward.  And, I use "pathway" very intentionally.  Just like you can't ask a person to just take a leap of 100 yards in a single bound, we can't ask people to just see that genital autonomy is a good thing.  We have to lay out stepping stones for them.

Saturday, November 14, 2020

Divided We Fall


I keep hoping this will get better, but it just keeps getting worse.  The COVID pandemic has added another level to it.

The genital autonomy movement is fractured in many ways.  People spend so much time fighting within, there isn't any time left spent on expanding the movement.

  • Racism
  • Vaccines
  • Abortion
  • Animal cruelty
  • Use of shame methods
  • "Professionalism"
  • Appropriate age of consent
  • Comparisons of victimhood (i.e. FGM vs. MGM and Rape)
  • MRA
  • Anti-feminism
  • Politics
  • I'm sure I'm missing something

It's crazy that we get angry that our freedom of speech is stomped on by the social media organizations, yet, we don't afford that same freedom within the movement.

Brendon Marotta, in his Intactivist Guidebook, promotes the idea of organization building but I just don't see how we are ever going to have a sizable organization when we let things divide us and take our focus off the prize: genital autonomy.

I've worked for many large (Fortune 500) companies in my IT career.  People in one part of the organization might not like what another part of the organization believes or does, but they were still loyal to the organization and supported the organization's mission; thus, they work together in spite of their differences.

This is an excellent meme, but it's only addressing one of many things that are dividing us:


I often hear that we are a small fringe movement.  I can see why people think that.  I try to change that perception by having the genitalautonomysociety.org/map page.

Sometimes I wonder if those who attempt to get others to disavow someone in the movement is really just a mole paid by the moneyed-interests.

Too many cowboys.  Too many chiefs.


People often do business with businesses even if they employ someone that they disagree with.  If the business is large enough, that one employee isn't going to impact their decision to do business.

I don't have the solution to this problem.  I just hope that this will get you to let go of any attachment to only collaborating with people that agree with you so we can achieve the goal.




Thursday, September 17, 2020

Cuties

The film "Cuties" on Netflix is getting a ton of attention lately.  I made the mistake (maybe?) of engaging in discussion about it on social media.

The main issue that I have with those that are riled up about the show is that people are equating what the creator of the film did with what pedophiles do.  Pedophiles normally take advantage of children that are what most would probably consider vulnerable.  That might mean that the child is too young to know better or might be developmentally delayed.  I don't know for sure, but I hope that the creator of the film fully informed these young ladies and got parental consent.

I have appreciated Netflix for taking on social issues head on.  This one certainly seems to be the hottest of them all.  What I find very interesting is that people are complaining about this one because they were "too young to consent" all while the American Circumcision documentary included an infant that definitely did NOT consent to having a large portion of his genitalia removed in full view!

How old should someone be before they should be allowed to consent to dancing provocatively? I'm not going to try to draw a specific line, that's not what I'm interested in here.

The film, like so many others that have graced Netflix, was designed to get people riled up about a social issue.  I imagine the hopes was that doing so would get people to do things to address it.  For instance, I hope more parents pay more attention to their children and all adults responsible for adolescents (teachers too) do more to properly educate those children so they are less vulnerable.

There are also the claims that it provided more material for pedophiles to take advantage of.  With that logic, we should remove all murder shows that give people ideas about how they might commit the perfect murder.

Just like I believe that it is not ethical for a doctor/butcher to only provide information to parents that lead them to believe that there are only benefits to cutting off part of their child's genitalia, I also believe that what pedophiles do is unethical.

Wednesday, August 12, 2020

The Genital Mutilation Weed

mogen clamp gomco clamp plastibell

I see genital mutilation practices as all sharing the same roots.  This stuck this idea in my head of a weed with 3 leaves: FGM, IGM and MGM.  If you are not clear about what "IGM" stands for, it's Intersex Genital Mutilation.  The intention is to show that we need to attack the roots, not the leaves.

The roots can be summarized to be:

  • Control
  • Aesthetics
  • Economics

Control

Control started out as an attempt to rein in sexual drive (not that I think it works).  However, it has expanded to include cultural conformity.  I say this because people are being controlled by their culture by choice or their parents are desiring to conform to the culture they are in and/or they wish to control the conformity of their child.  Being separated from the herd is a very powerful fear, thus, a very difficult root to pull out.  I believe this fear is also what drives us to be ignorant about the topic - meaning, not wanting to learn about the practices for fear that we may realize that it's wrong.

Aesthetics

I hear that the preputially amputated penis looks better far too frequently.  Once I learned about how the natural penis works, I just think it looks mutilated, but, when all you see is preputially amputated penii, it's understandable why people might think the more common penis is the better looking one.  However, I also think that it's built into the female DNA because the appearance of the glans tells them that the male is ready for sex and women do not understand the feelings they are feeling when they see a penis.

It's very clear that intersex normalization or binary surgeries are frequently about aesthetics.  Anything that does not fit the binary view makes people uncomfortable.  And, understandably, parents want their child to be attractive to the opposite sex so they have a good chance at a love life.

Even if the intersex case looks normal from the external view, to a medical professional, if things do not look like they are used to under the skin, they may have an automatic belief that something is wrong.

For female genital cutting, this does not always apply since many cases, such as ritual nicks, there is no visible difference.  However, there does seem to be cases where there is a desire for the labia to be trimmed.

The aesthetics connects back to control as there is a desire to look like peers.  This leads to statements like:

  • "They will be made fun of in the locker room."
  • "They need to match."

Economics

While there is clearly many financial reasons for individuals to press forward with male genital cutting, there are also for the other two.  Let me start with the many for male GC:

  • The surgeons/butchers collect a paycheck.
  • The sex lube companies sell more.
  • The pharmaceuticals sell more erectile dysfunction drugs (i.e. Viagra).
  • The cosmetics industry uses the very pure tissue from what is removed.

For intersex, the only thing I can think of is the paychecks for the surgeons.

For female genital cutting, there is the paycheck for the mohels (yes, they use the same term as the Jewish term for those who cut males).  However, the economics seem to go very deep.  Families often NEED to sell their daughters in order to feed the rest of the family.  If their daughters are not fixed to make sure they are virgins, they may not be valued.



Wednesday, July 22, 2020

Why the war for genital autonomy is such a difficult one

It has been 2.5 years since I decided to come out publicly against infant "circumcision."  I have become heavily involved among those who fight for genital autonomy.  I've seen many challenges that is holding back progress.


I think cognitive dissonance is the biggest hurdle and root to many of the others that I will discuss.  Facing the possibility that our own genitalia is not better, but maybe worse is very difficult to consider.  And, if you are a parent that had the same performed on your child, I can only image that compounds it for us.  Another thing that may compound it even further is if we were indoctrinated by religion, culture and/or medical school.  Imagine being a doctor that has been performing these non-consensual non-therapeutic surgeries that also went through the surgery, who's friends and family went through the surgery, their religion dictates the surgery and their medical school taught them how to do the surgery.  And not that this is NOT limited to male genital surgeries.  That is a LOT to consider potentially being wrong.


We are also fighting against the most visible people in the world holding the most powerful position in politics.


We are fighting big money.  The wealthiest of the world has spent tons of money promoting genital cutting practices.  I don't know whether they were duped by greedy people that manipulated studies to make it seem like a good idea or whether they even realized the unintended consequences of supporting harmful practices or whether they had their own motives; I just know that big money has big influence  and until someone else with big money comes along to counter it, grass roots activism is going to have to get very big to counter it.


We are challenged with celebrities that support and promote genital cutting practices.


Nearly half of the world follows one of the Abrahamic religions.  While the views vary among the various groups, the root goes to the Abrahamic covenant.  Some believe that their religion cannot survive without holding to that covenant.  The fear of not having an immortal soul backed by such a religion is a strong one!  Add to that the fears of social separation or even death for questioning that part of the religion compounds on top of the immortal soul fear.

I have spoken with religious leaders that admit that they will not speak out publicly for fear of losing much of their congregation / support.


I've been quite excited by the growth of social media because the mass media has been very redundant and has become too powerful of an influence over society.  However, I believe that most of what most people are fed still comes from mass media and they rarely tackle the issue.  I can only imagine why.


Some get defensive when speaking about the harm done to those that are the same sex as they are and someone else chimes in with the harm done to another sex.  This defense is due to the belief that it diminishes the harm to their own sex.  I believe that working together for genital autonomy for everyone makes us stronger than if we attempt to gain genital autonomy for only one.  In fact, I might say that fighting for only one is counter-productive.  Trying to determine who is the bigger victim only deters us from focusing on protecting the next generation.


Victims have a hard time being advocates.  Every time they attempt to advocate for the next generation, they are refreshing in their own mind their own victim-hood.  It's a negative piled onto another negative.  I have met many victims that do not speak out, and, as a victim myself, I can see why.  So, when you see one person speaking out, imagine that there are probably thousands more that just do not have the ability to get past their own fight within themselves to speak out as well.  I know of one advocate that was also a victim that committed suicide.  And, remember that victims include regret parents; it's hard to understand that if you are not a parent yourself.  Give them all the positive vibes you can!  God knows they need it!


I've come across advocates that can't stand with advocates that are also regret parents.  I know one that believed all regret parents should go to the police and turn themselves in.  While, if I was a regret parent myself, I probably would, I don't see that the threat of prison time will get more regret parents to be advocates.  It's sort of how the police deal with drug lords: they make deals with the minions to get to the drug lords.


This image does not do justice to the complexity of the many approaches to tackle this issue.  There is constant discourse among the advocates regarding the best ways to do so.  The most common one that fits in the "challenging social attitudes & beliefs" bubble is whether to approach people with a "gentle education" method, aggressive shaming method or somewhere in between.  I find that generally, victims will use more aggressive methods because they are hurting emotionally.  Some believe that approach scares people away, which may be true with many, however, if people do not hear the hurt of the victims, they may not believe the victims exist or aren't all that harmed.

The challenge here is that people are excluded from various genital autonomy groups because differing ideas and approaches.  I created genitalautonomysociety.org where every advocate can join with the simple premise that they believe that everyone has the right to the genitalia they were born with.  There is no way for other advocates to get into discourse about other issues.  However, as much as I tried, one person found out that another individual was registered there and decided not to join just because they disagree politically with that individual!  So much for having one place for all advocates to take a stand of solidarity!  :(   I find such behavior very selfish - let's think about the next generation!


The man in white is Brother K from the Bloodstained Men group.  They were protesting in Alabama when this occurred.  The USA may have a constitution that guarantees freedom of speech, but that does not mean law enforcement won't find some law to arrest you with if they really want to.  Alon Sivroni has been attacked, on multiple occasions, protesting in Israel.  I imagine there is real risk of execution in Islamic countries, thus, there is very little known advocacy in those areas; which also happens to be the areas where female genital cutting practices are most prevalent.


I know of people that have lost their job over their advocacy work.  I think this explains, in part, why so many of the advocates are retired.  While I can't prove it, I am confident that my public advocacy has impacted my employ-ability.  How many medical professionals are gag-ordered to stay quiet to keep working at hospitals?  How many are afraid to speak out against it when they've been performing the practice because they are afraid of being sued?


Being ejected from our pack is a severe fear.  I swear our Saint Bernard has nightmares JUST because she's been left at home alone at times.  No matter how introverted you are, I think we all need a certain amount of connection and support with fellow human beings.  Even in female genital cutting cultures, most support the practices and going against the norm can get you shunned from the group.  While the trend seems to be shifting in the USA, and already shifted significantly in Europe and Australia, this is still a clear challenge.


A study was done that found that a large percentage of medical training materials completely failed to provide the anatomy of the male prepuce.  Someone I know of by the name of Jessica Pin has been fighting to improve medical training materials regarding the anatomy of female genitalia.  It wasn't too long ago that Dr. Money pushed genital surgeries to make children more fit the binary norm, and surgeries based on his views are still occurring.  People that got their degree based on these are difficult to convince that they didn't learn everything they need to.


And, if all that wasn't enough, there's censorship.  I have seen this in so many ways in so many places.  Sometimes I get so frustrated seeing it, I'm driven even more to go stand on a corner somewhere in my bloodstained pants outfit.

I hope this has not gotten you depressed.  It's meant to recognize and acknowledge the huge mountain that us genital autonomy advocates are attempting to move.  We ARE making progress, but it can never happen fast enough.